Rush Hour 3
Director: Brett Ratner
Cast: Jackie Chan, Chris Tucker, Vinnie Jones, Hiroyuki Sanada, Noemie Lenoir, Max von Sydow, Yvan Attal, Sun Ming Ming
Genre: Action / Comedy
Rated: PG-13
Review By:
Michael Dance
School:
NYU Tisch '07
Quote:
"...And hey, I met you. You are not cool." -Almost Famous
Rush Hour 3
Review By: Michael Dance
MichaelDance@TheCinemaSource.com
Rush Hour 3
I have nothing in particular against the Rush Hour movies. They're too generic for that. If you ever meet anyone unfamiliar to the Hollywood moviemaking system we have in place today, just show them a Rush Hour movie, because they have everything you need to know: action scenes, a PG-13 rating, a few girls in lingerie, cops, criminals, comic relief from a wisecracking black guy, the works. It's all covered.
It's been a long six years since the second installment came out, when I was not yet a high school upperclassman. My friends and I went to see American Pie 2, and after it was over nobody wanted to go home so we snuck into another theater and started watching Rush Hour 2 instead. Ah, the memories.
Sorry, back on topic. It's just hard to come up with something to say about a movie that strives toward nothing more than to be as unexceptional as possible. The plot is, well, eh, who cares. There's some kind of secret organization, and an assassination attempt on somebody, and that sort of thing. One of the good guys is secretly a bad guy, but you'll realize that the second he appears on screen. Jeff Nathanson is a talented enough screenwriter (he did Catch Me If You Can) but he's not even trying here. It's as though he never bothered to revise the script whatsoever in order to iron out logistics and continuity. Sure, he hits those major plot beats and provides ample space for comic and fight interludes, but none of the minor cause-and-effect logic makes any sense when you really think about it (and trust me, your mind will be wandering).
Just one example of how shoddily each scene is set up: our heroes Carter (Chris Tucker) and Lee (Jackie Chan) think a young woman visiting her injured father in a hospital is in grave danger. They rush back to the hospital, which is for some reason completely empty except for the father's room, where the girl sits. Lee draws back the window shade a tiny bit, and luckily the 10-by-10 square foot section of the parking lot he's able to see happens to be the exact spot where a handful of assassins are casually climbing out of their car. After they come up, a gunfight commences in the hospital wing, which has been and remains completely devoid of any doctors, nurses and patients. I guess they heard a fight scene was about to be staged there.
Speaking of the fight scenes, it may just be that my memory of the previous films is too rose-colored, but they seemed a little weak this time around. I always enjoy Chan jumping around and creatively manipulating the environment like only he can, but the
Oh yeah, I never mentioned that they're in France. They are, for the majority of the film anyway, and one of the big additions to the cast is George (Yvan Attal), their cab driver, who is meant and succeeds to be a big crowd-pleaser. Wearing a two-day-old beard and a wide-eyed goofy stare, he initially professes hatred of the United States, but quickly becomes an ally after a car chase, because he wants to, and I'm paraphrasing, "be a secret agent like Americans who kill people for no reason."Â That sounds slightly more like James Bond than an American, but I won't split hairs. Point is, George is a likable and welcome addition to the cast (although he had one line that stuck out: in his initial anti-American diatribe, he mentions that we "lost in Vietnam and lost in Iraq."Â If it's gotten to the point where a major Hollywood movie says we've lost a war, does that make it true?)
There's no denying that Tucker and Chan have a good, obvious chemistry, and plenty of the movie is funny enough to elicit a few laughs. It's by no means bad. A lot people, I imagine, will really like it, just as a lot of people really liked the previous two movies. Most people don't want much more from their movies. They'd rather relax for an hour and a half and chuckle a few times, not think or get too worked up. I really can't fault them for that, so by extension, I really can't fault Nathanson, Tucker, Chan, or even director Brett Ratner, who I'm still mad at for destroying the X-Men franchise's credibility last summer. Ratner is the king of making mediocre movies that are easy to sell, and if that was the job description, I hope he enjoys the paycheck.
(I hope Tucker and Chan do too: Tucker reportedly made 30 million dollars on this because he flat-out refused to do it unless they paid him that much. Since New Line understandably wanted to make it considering the financial successes of the first two, they gave him what he wanted. Chan, unsurprisingly an all-around nicer guy, wasn't a jerk about it and took 15 million dollars, still quite a sizable raise from last time.)
If you're the type that doesn't ask for much from your movies, and if you've liked the first two, you'll probably like Rush Hour 3, since it is, as expected, the exact same thing a
Movie Grade: B-
Synopsis:
Fast-talking detective James Carter (Chris Tucker) teams up with Hong Kong’s finest (Jackie Chan) once more to face-off against Chinese gangsters in Paris.




























I?m certain you can find a lot of added good instances within the long term for individuals who study your website.
Greetings! I know this is somewhat off topic however I wanted to ask which site platform you are using for this webpage? I’m getting tired of Wp because I’ve had issues with online hackers. Cheers!