The Brave One

Director: Neil Jordan

Cast: Jodie Foster, Terrence Howard, Naveen Andrews, Nicky Katt, Mary Steenburgen

Genre: Crime / Drama / Thriller

Rated: R

Review By:
Michael Dance

School:
NYU Tisch '07

Quote:
"...And hey, I met you. You are not cool." -Almost Famous

The_Brave_One-Poster
Release Date: September 14th, 2007
Overall Grade: C+

The Brave One

Review By: Michael Dance
MichaelDance@TheCinemaSource.com

The Brave One

In a recent interview, Jodie Foster said that she didn’t like the title of The Brave One because she didn’t consider her character, Erica Bain, brave. She found Erica’s progression throughout the movie to be a downward spiral that portrayed Erica becoming more corrupted and soulless.

So here’s the thing: I wholeheartedly agree with that, and if that’s what the movie was actually about, it would be fascinating. But that’s actually the opposite of what the movie is trying to say. By the end of the movie, it’s very clear that we’re being told Erica is a hero who’s doing the right thing and has fully healed. Which makes Foster’s comments baffling to me. Why did you take the movie if it was clearly endorsing the actions of a character you found to be reprehensible?

Let’s back up a bit. The Brave One is a violent thriller that starts out as a New York City-set romance between Erica and her fiance David. Erica is a radio talk show host, and David works at a hospital. They’re taking their dog through the park one night when they get attacked by a small group of young thugs. Erica is badly beaten, and David is killed. (Right off the bat this doesn’t make sense, because David is played by Naveen Andrews, who on Lost can beat the crap out of anyone, often with his hands literally tied behind his back. Sorry, it’s my favorite show, had to mention it.)

Anyway, after being released from the hospital, Erica grieves quietly in her apartment, afraid to go outside. She finally goes to the police to check on her case, but when they take too long to help her, she crosses the street and buys a gun for her protection.

Afterwards, in a series of absurdly contrived sequences (especially considering the film keeps reminding us that New York City is actually remarkably safe), Erica finds herself in a series of dangerous situations which she solves by killing whoever’s threatening her. She witnesses a guy shoot his ex-wife; two guys pull knives on her in the subway; etc. Statistically, the amount of dangerous situations she gets into within a tiny time span is impossible, even if you throw in psychology about how she’s subconsciously seeking it out. But you know what? Fine. Without these scenes there wouldn’t be a movie, I get it. So, fine.

As you can tell, at this point I was less than impressed. So far, all the material is either in, or can be inferred by, the trailers for the movie, and I stopped feeling sorry for Erica the minute she pulled the trigger the first time. But more on that later. The movie actually gets rolling when

it begins to develop a relationship between Erica and Detective Mercer (a strong Terrence Howard). Mercer is investigating the murders that Erica commits, and Erica, compelled to meet him, befriends him under the guise of asking about her own case.

An awkward friendship progresses, and I found the dynamics quite interesting. Mercer is a cop who puts his faith in the legal system but is nonetheless frustrated by high-powered criminals who roam free thanks to its loopholes, and he has no idea that Erica is linked to the current murders by the mysterious vigilante. (Has no idea at first, of course. He’s a smart cop.) Erica, meanwhile, is able to learn more about his own by-the-book philosophy will being careful not to expose herself for what she is. The subtlety and subtext that went into their conversations obviously required a lot of thought, which results in some great scenes.

Then the ending shoots itself in the foot by going for a violent action scene that results in one character making a decision I found to be truly tragic. I’m not usually one to preach about morals, but this movie has the same pathetic frame of mind as The Boondock Saints, the flick that preached to us all that it’s okay to kill large crowds of people as long as you’re almost sure that some of them are probably sort of bad people. I honestly thought a cast of this caliber and director Neil Jordan were above that sort of thing. If they made a movie with the exact same plot that actually dealt with its violence in a mature and thoughtful sense (go watch Unforgiven instead), they might have really had something. And yes, this is different from random action movies where the good guy blows away hundreds of bad guys, because the violence here is supposed to be the main theme. To make that your theme, and then to conclude with something as simple — and as just plain wrong — as “violent revenge makes everyone feel better” is a waste of what was otherwise an effective thriller.

Movie Grade: C+

Synopsis:

New York radio host Erica Bain (Jodie Foster) has a life that she loves and a fiancé she adores. All of it is taken from her when a brutal attack leaves Erica badly wounded and her fiancé dead. Unable to move past the tragedy, Erica begins prowling the city streets at night to track down the men she holds responsible. Her dark pursuit of justice catches the public’s attention, and the city is riveted by her anonymous exploits. But with the NYPD desperate to find the culprit and a dogged police detective (Terrence Howard) hot on her trail, she must decide whether her quest for revenge is truly the right path, or if she is

becoming the very thing she is trying to stop.

Leave a Reply